Latest News

13Nov

Micronutrients for wheat

THIS PROMOTIONAL FEATURE WAS PROVIDED BY BALLANCE AGRI-NUTRIENTS

Micronutrient deficiencies can impact wheat yield and grain nutritional quality, but does applying micronutrients always improve these factors?

It is not quite as straightforward as that, according to results from a comprehensive trial in Canterbury, New Zealand’s main wheat growing area1.

The trial demonstrated that if soil pH is maintained in the optimum range of pH 5.8–6.2, wheat is unlikely to show a yield response to the micronutrients boron (B), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn) or zinc (Zn). The trials were carried out over two growing seasons on commercial farms, across 20 sites in Year 1 and three in the Year 2.

In Year 1, crops received either no micronutrients (control), Cu (soil or foliar applied), Mn (foliar applied), and Zn or B (soil applied). There was no significant yield response to any of these treatments in the first year, despite about half the trial sites being below the suggested critical soil thresholds for Cu and Zn. Furthermore, soil test results for Cu and Zn did not correlate with the plants’ micronutrient status.

After Mn foliar application, two sites showed a significant yield reduction. Tissue Mn at ear emergence in treated plants ranged from 21–164 mg/kg, and was in some cases above
Hill Laboratories’ normal range of 25–100 mg/kg. On untreated plants, tissue Mn was always within the normal range.

After Cu foliar application, overall yield reduced by more than 0.5 t/ha at four sites, and visual symptoms of damage were seen in some plots, indicating crop damage. However, in treated plants, tissue Cu levels at ear emergence ranged from 5.6–22.6 mg/kg, which is within the normal range of 5–25 mg/kg.

In Year 2, responses to soil applied Zn and foliar applied Cu and Mn were assessed (as grain yield and micronutrient levels in tissues at mid-late tillering and ear emergence) under three lime application rates (0, 5, 10 t /ha). Two sites showed averaged yield responses across treatments of 0.4 t/ha (at Rakaia) and 0.9 t/ha (at Barhill) to Mn, but not to Zn  or Cu.

At the Barhill site, applying lime without Mn caused a significant yield reduction (averaged 8 per cent), and this effect w as overcome when Mn was included with lime treatments.
It appears Mn deficiency was yield limiting and the effect was exacerbated by liming.

Learnings and recommendations

According to the trials, the only micronutrient likely to limit yield in Canterbury is Mn, particularly in known localised areas of deficiency such as Barrhill, and also if overliming raises soil pH above optimum. If soil pH gets too high the risk, particularly in cereals, is that plants will not get enough micronutrients. Application of lime, particularly at above optimal pH, can worsen micronutrient deficiencies such as Mn, so overliming should be avoided, particularly on soils prone to low Mn levels.

To identify a micronutrient deficiency, crop tissue tests are recommended, as in the trial soil tests for micronutrients did not correlate with the plants’ micronutrient status. Crop
tissue levels correlate well with relative yield.

Micronutrient application is not an effective way of improving the grain’s nutritional quality; in the trials, applying micronutrients increased concentrations in vegetative tissue but not  in the grain (with the exception of Zn in Year 2 sites).

Although direct yield responses to micronutrients are unlikely, there may still be value in applying these micronutrients to prevent their depletion in intensively cropped soils using a product such as YaraMila Actyva S. This ideal base/starter fertiliser for spring (or autumn) sown cereals contains Mn, Zn and B as well as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur in a convenient granule to help promote an even establishment. It is suitable for broadcasting or drilling.

The best approach is to plan cropping well in advance and apply lime a year before the most pH-sensitive crop in the rotation. Lime needs at least 12 months to take full effect, and 1 t/ha will shift pH by 0.1. If pH is less than ideal, take this into account in yield estimates.

1 Curtin D, Martin RJ, Scott CL 2008, Wheat (Triticum aestivum) response to micronutrients (Mn, Cu, Zn, B) in Canterbury, New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 36: 169–81

Related

Recognition for hard mahi

Recognition for hard mahi

Ruralco Chair Jessie Chan was recently appointed as a Member of the New Zealand Order of Merit for h...

Read More
Introducing Align's game changing resilience

Introducing Align's game changing resilience

Introducing Agricom’s smartest grass yet. Align AR37. Our new, extremely late heading, tetraploid p...

Read More
Off grid an option for Basil’s needs

Off grid an option for Basil’s needs

Getting off the grid and onto a power supply that can still meet his relatively high-power needs has...

Read More
FMG – helping to protect rural communities together

FMG – helping to protect rural communities together

FMG began their partnership with Melanoma New Zealand a couple of years back, helping to share life-...

Read More
Rural resilience: Supporting mental health in rural communities

Rural resilience: Supporting mental health in rural communities

Early on in 2023 the Mid Canterbury Rural Support Trust identified the need to continue building our...

Read More
Making positive changes on farm

Making positive changes on farm

Changing milking frequency from twice a day to once a day or going to 16 hours isn’t hard, but it r...

Read More




Account Selector